FREQUENCY
The magazine Scientiarum Historia has an annual edition, in one or two volumes. Authors who wish to publish in the journal have the option of submitting their manuscripts on a continuous basis. The best works presented at the Scientiarum Historia Congress undergo pre-selection, and their authors are invited to submit to the magazine. All articles go through a rigorous double-blind scientific peer review process. If approved, they will form the annual volumes of the Journal.
OPEN ACESS POLICY
This magazine offers immediate free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public provides greater worldwide democratization of knowledge.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. The authors, when submitting their work to this journal, demonstrate that they agree with this license.
PLAGIARISM
Scientiarum Historia Magazine will verify the presence of plagiarism through the tools OriginalityCheck or SimilarityCheck, in all submitted manuscripts before submitting them for peer review. The Editorial Team considers the duplicated or fragmented publication of the same research as an ethical infraction.
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
The complete flow, from submission to final publication, is summarized below:
A - Submission of the manuscript in the electronic system of the Scientiarum Historia Magazine.
B - Pre-evaluation of the manuscript to check for errors in formatting or in filling in the information, in addition to certifying if it has sufficient academic quality to proceed to the next step.
C - One or two "ad hoc" reviewers are selected to evaluate the manuscript (double blind), having the following options: Accept, Mandatory corrections, Submit again for evaluation or Reject. In case of divergence of opinions, other evaluators will be selected.
D - The author must consider the recommendations made by the referees and carry out, if necessary, the requested changes. When returning with a new version, make the changes made explicit to the reviewers at the end of the document, which may also be highlighted in the body of the text (red or blue). If all the changes are satisfactory, the Editor-in-Chief will give the final decision for the publication of the manuscript, even if it has been previously approved by the referees. After a few rounds of evaluation, if gaps remain that still compromise the quality of the work, the manuscript should be rejected.
E - The authors are notified about the approval of the article and soon after it will be published in a temporary version (in press).
F - After being submitted for final review, the article will be published in its final version.
IMPORTANT REMARKS
- Articles that contain plagiarism, that do not have a consent form for the use of images (if applicable) or that are being evaluated or published in parallel in any other scientific journal, partially or in full, will be rejected and filed, even if they have already been approved previously.
- The Editor-in-Chief may at any time relocate the article section as long as its inadequacy is verified.
- It will be up to the Editor-in-Chief or the Associate Editors to arbitrate on any other issue not covered in this description.
INDEXING
Accepted articles are published electronically in the journal Scientiarum Historia, presented here, under ISSN 2675-6404, with a DOI number assigned to each article.
RESPONSIBLE INSTITUTION
Programa de Pós-Graduação em História das Ciências e das Técnicas e Epistemologia - Universidad Federal do Rio de Janeiro (HCTE-UFRJ).
ADDRESS
Avenida Atos da Silveira Ramos, 274
Cidade Universitária
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Rio de Janeiro - RJ 21044-020
scientiarum.historia@hcte.ufrj.br
